How Auditors Detect / Trap Cash Siphoning : red flagging and documenting evidence

!! Academic Purpose only

🔎 How Auditors Detect / Trap Cash Siphoning

1. Related-Party Transactions (Sec. 40A(2), AS-18 / Ind AS-24)

  • Check disclosures in notes to accounts for related-party names.

  • Verify pricing: Compare payments to related parties vs. market rates.

  • Audit Trail: Match invoices with actual delivery/benefit received.

  • Trap: If related parties are paid more than fair value (inflated expenses), auditor questions management & reports under CARO/Tax Audit (Form 3CD, Clause 23/31).


2. Inflated Expenses

  • Analytical procedures: Compare expense ratios (advertising, consultancy, repairs) vs. past years/industry average.

  • Vouching: Verify supporting bills, contracts, and third-party confirmations.

  • Cash flow check: Expense shown in P&L but no matching service/goods delivered.

  • Trap: Fake vendors or repetitive round invoices without actual service.


3. Round-Tripping of Funds

  • Bank reconciliation: Unusual high-value transactions flowing out and back within short span.

  • Ledger scrutiny: Same set of entities appearing in sales & purchases, or loans given & received.

  • Trap: Circular movement of money without substance → flagged in CARO (“funds advanced and returned”).


4. Mismatch between Profit & Cash Flow

  • High profit but negative OCF (like we discussed).

  • Auditor checks debtor ageing, inventory valuation, advances.

  • Trap: Aggressive sales booked → cash not realized → possible diversion.


5. Third-Party Confirmations

  • Direct confirmation from creditors, lenders, vendors, or related parties.

  • If management resists confirmations → auditor notes “scope limitation.”

  • Trap: If balances differ from client books → possible manipulation.


6. Forensic Techniques (if suspicion is strong)

  • Data analytics: unusual patterns (split payments < ₹20,000 to avoid Section 40A(3)).

  • Benford’s Law analysis (fraud detection in invoice values).

  • KYC of counterparties (fake shell vendors often have same address/phone).


🔹 Auditor’s Reporting Duty

  • CARO 2020 (for companies): Requires reporting on related-party transactions, loans/advances, fund diversion.

  • Form 3CD (Tax Audit): Requires disclosure of related-party payments (Clause 23), cash transactions (Clause 31).

  • If siphoning is suspected → auditor qualifies report or gives Emphasis of Matter.



Summary:
An auditor “traps” cash siphoning by testing related-party payments, verifying expenses, tracking fund flow, seeking confirmations, and reconciling cash flows. Any mismatch or lack of evidence forces management to explain, else auditor qualifies report.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Capital Gains Tax on Sale

What Is Incriminating Material in Income Tax Law?

EEE Savings Scheme typically refers to tax-saving investment options that offer exemptions at three stages